Author Info
The submission of fully structured papers including core findings, tables, figures, and references are cordially encouraged by the authors. All submitted papers will undergo double-blind peer review and be scored according to clarity, novelty, research content, accuracy, and relevance to the conference.
* The research paper length should not be more than 8 pages including references.
* The poster length should not be more than 4 pages including references.
Review Process
The review process will be double-blind, so please ensure your submission is anonymized. This means that all identifying information about the author(s) or their institution(s) must be removed: do not include the author(s) names or affiliations at the beginning of the paper, anonymize references to your own previous work that are directly relevant to the current submission, and exclude any funding or acknowledgments. Each paper will be evaluated by a minimum of three regular program committee members or two senior program committee members. Acceptance decisions will be based on the paper’s novelty, technical depth, elegance, potential impact (both practical and theoretical), and overall presentation.
The papers should be innovative, proposing new algorithms, techniques, frameworks, or insights that contribute to advancing the field. The papers must demonstrate technical depth, offering a rigorous analysis of the proposed methods and showing how they compare to existing approaches, backed by sound theoretical foundations. Clarity is crucial, as complex concepts and results must be communicated in an accessible and understandable way, with well-structured arguments and logical flow. A high-quality paper should include empirical evidence or experiments that validate the claims, along with transparent discussions of limitations and assumptions. Additionally, the research should be relevant, addressing important problems in computer science, whether in software development, systems design, artificial intelligence, or other areas, with practical implications or potential for future research. Finally, a good paper should engage the broader community, offering insights that can influence both academia and industry and stimulate further discussion or innovation.
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics is a priority for the Second International Conference on Security, Surveillance and Artificial Intelligence (2nd ICSSAI-2025). All parties participating in the publication process, including authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers, are expected to behave ethically according to this declaration.
Responsibilities of Authors
Originality and Plagiarism: Authors are responsible for making sure their writing is unique and hasn't been published anywhere else. The words and works of others must be properly acknowledged and cited.
Authorship of the Paper: Only individuals who have significantly influenced the idea, planning, execution, or interpretation of the published study should be able to claim authorship. Every contributor needs to be identified as a co-author.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication: It is not advisable for authors to simultaneously submit the same work to multiple journals or conferences. It is unethical and improper to submit the same study to several journals.
Acknowledgment of Sources: The effort of others must be properly acknowledged by authors. Private information exchanged through chat, email, or discussions with other people cannot be utilized or reported without the source's express written consent.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Authors should disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that might influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed
Data Access and Retention: In connection with a publication for editorial review, authors may be required to submit the raw data; if feasible, they should be ready to make the data available to the public.
Responsibilities of Editors
Fair Play: Editors are required to evaluate manuscripts only on the basis of their intellectual merit, without taking into account the authors' political beliefs, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or place of citizenship.
Confidentiality: Editors and editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Without the author's express written authorisation, unpublished materials described in a submitted manuscript may not be used by an editor in their own research.
Decision on the Publication of Articles: Selecting which of the articles submitted for the conference should be published is the editor's responsibility. The decision should be limited by applicable laws and directed by the Conference's editorial board policies.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review helps editors make editorial decisions, and it may also help authors improve their work through editorial contacts with them.
Promptness: If a peer reviewer is chosen and feels unfit to examine the research presented in a paper or if they know it will not be reviewed promptly, they should inform the editor and withdraw from the review process.
Confidentiality: Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity: Evaluations have to be carried out impartially. The author should not be subjected to personal criticism. Officials are expected to articulate their opinions with clarity and logic.
Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Peer review should ensure confidential and non-personally beneficial use of privileged information or ideas, and reviewers should avoid manuscripts with conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other connections with authors, companies, or institutions.
Ethical Oversight
The conference follows COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines for publication ethics and malpractice issues, investigating suspected misconduct and taking appropriate action, including retraction of published papers, to ensure ethical publication practices.
Handling of Misconduct
Conference organizers will address scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication, or plagiarism by publishing an erratum, retraction, or legal action if necessary.
The Second International Conference on Security, Surveillance and Artificial Intelligence (2nd ICSSAI-2025) is committed to upholding ethical principles and maintaining academic integrity, requiring cooperation from all involved parties to uphold these standards.